The report shows a number of examples of the widespread way in which the sentencing guidelines are being used in order to criminalise Muslims and indeed increase the fear and stigma surrounding terrorism within the Muslim community. Guantanamo may well be the symbol of arbitrary detention and removal of due process, however, the US mainland requires much work before it can lay claim to a fair, open and justice system for all.
Too blunt for just outcomes: Why the US terrorism enhancement sentencing guidelines are unfair, unconstitutional and ineffective in the fight against terrorismWritten by Aviva Stahl Thursday, 02 June 2011
The report shows a number of examples of the widespread way in which the sentencing guidelines are being used in order to criminalise Muslims
Part of the history of the United States of America is the way that its judicial system has attempted to consistently provide justice to those that come before its purview. This history, however, is not devoid of its exceptions. Isolated communities over the years have fallen victim to gross miscarriages of justice, whether it was the Japanese-Americans during World War II or communists in a post-war world. There have been a number of occasions where the US justice system has allowed itself to fall victim to the politics of fear.
The most well known example of how a community has been systematically alienated from the judicial process is that of African-Americans. Through the work of individuals such as Sister Helen Prejean, there has been a great deal of documentation of the ways in which the community has been subjected to biased trials, procedural impropriety and disproportionate sentencing. Even today, discrimination against African-Americans continues as record numbers of black men are incarcerated and sentenced disproportionally.
With much focus on the illegality of the prison camps at Guantanamo Bay and the military commission process that is being used in order to try the detainees, there is very little scrutiny of the way in which Muslims are being treated within the US justice system. From a number of perspectives, Muslims have become the new ‘black’ and are being treated as a singular threat.
Although there are real areas of concern in relation to due process and procedural impropriety, the focus of this report is on the sentencing guidelines that are used in cases involving Muslims. Even where the convictions against a Muslim suspect bear only a very peripheral relation to terrorism, a terrorism enhancement is being applied which dramatically increases the number of years to be served by the defendant.
Read 3969 times | Like this? Tweet it to your followers!
Login to post comments
International human rights breaches - State accountability v State immunity
Legal seminar: Preserving the rule of law: taking a risk
Extradited to a future of torture: the reality of solitary confinement in America
Spying and Entrapment
Starving for justice
Are Muslims active enough in the fight against Guantanamo?
Guantanamo: 100 days of hunger strike - Template Khutba
Muslim students discriminated against in the UK
Help Lynne Stewart, civil rights lawyer for Muslim defendants, stay alive
How your Schedule 7 swab could help get your family arrested
Why haven't you signed the Shaker Aamer petition?