Dear Miss *****,
Thank you for your email of 28th October about Babar Ahmad and UK extradition law.
I am grateful to you for taking the time to raise your concerns about the case of Babar Ahmad with me. As you will be aware, each case is dealt with under UK extradition law which contains many safeguards. Although I appreciate your interest, it would neither be legal nor possible to place cases on hold in the way you request. That would involve, in a wholly inappropriate way, prolonging the custody or extending the bail conditions of persons currently the subject of proceedings. However, in order to ensure that the relevant Minister is aware of your concerns, I have written to Theresa May MP, Home Secretary. I will write again as soon as I hear further.
With reference to the UK system, I do think that the Extradition Act passed by the last Labour Government was premature and did not achieve a reciprocal approach on extradition to the UK from the US. The Gary MacKinnon case has, as you acknowledge, been a particularly poor example of the current law on extradition to the US. My view is that the position needs to change, but if there were any future changes, they would not operate retrospectively so Mr Ahmed's position is unlikely to be affected by any reform.
Accordingly, whilst the review is taking place, UK authorities must continue to act in conformity with the existing provisions and statutory deadlines of Extradition Act 2003 and fulfil its international obligations towards its many extradition partners. These are obligations the UK takes very seriously. Failure to comply would not only place us in breach of these obligations but would also jeopardise our ability to seek the extradition of persons from other countries.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write to me. I hope that this is helpful.
Yours ever,
Robert Buckland MP
Robert Buckland MP demonstrates his blindness to the injustices that Babar faces
Written by Hinnah Monday, 01 November 2010Buckland MP clearly puts the blame for the lame extradition laws on New Labour, disregarding what the Coalition government can clearly do to right this wrong. He also wears blinkers when addressing the injustice Babar and Co. are facing under this oppressive treaty. The reponse was elicited by Cageprisoners' volunteer Hinnah, may Allaah reward her for her efforts. Ameen.
Follow her example and campaign for Babar here.
Events
-
International human rights breaches - State accountability v State immunity
A forum to discuss the issues surrounding International human rights breaches – State accountability v…
-
Legal seminar: Preserving the rule of law: taking a risk
A discussion between noted human…
-
Extradited to a future of torture: the reality of solitary confinement in America
-
Spying and Entrapment
What's New
-
Starving for justice
Shaker Aamer, Fayiz al-Kandari, Samir Moqbel and 163 other have been starving for over 100 days to get justice.
-
Are Muslims active enough in the fight against Guantanamo?
Tariq Ramadan speaks to Moazzam Begg about the Guantanamo hunger strikers and…
-
Guantanamo: 100 days of hunger strike - Template Khutba
For exactly 100 days today, Guantanamo detainees have been on hunger strike,…
-
Muslim students discriminated against in the UK
Is the British government is really clamping down on Islamic extremism at British…
Blog
-
Help Lynne Stewart, civil rights lawyer for Muslim defendants, stay alive
Lynne Stewart is a prominent civil rights lawyer who’s now facing the prospect of death on the inside.
-
How your Schedule 7 swab could help get your family arrested
Have you ever been swabbed under Schedule 7 or in any criminal…
-
Why haven't you signed the Shaker Aamer petition?
What do you see when you read the name? I often…



RSS Feed
Please wait...